The debate on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) occupies a central place in India’s constitutional and socio-legal discourse. Envisaged under Article 44 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, the UCC aims to establish a uniform set of secular civil laws applicable to all citizens without discrimination based on religion, caste, sex or community. Its primary objective is to promote equality, ensure gender justice, simplify the legal framework and strengthen the secular character of the nation, thereby harmonising the diverse personal laws that govern Indian society.

The idea of ​​the UCC has deep historical roots. During the colonial period, the British codified criminal and commercial laws but deliberately refrained from interfering with personal laws to prevent protests from religious communities. After independence, the Constituent Assembly debated the desirability of the UCC. Still, it ultimately retained it as a Directive Principle rather than a justiciable right, thereby striking a balance between national uniformity and religious autonomy. The judiciary has further shaped this discourse through landmark cases such as Mohammed Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985), Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995), and Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017), which highlighted the tension between personal laws and constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity.

Despite significant challenges such as cultural diversity, concerns of minorities, and political sensitivities, the prospects for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) remain strong. Initiatives such as the Goa Civil Code and the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Act (2024) suggest that a phased, consultative, and rights-based approach can pave a pragmatic path towards a uniform civil framework for all citizens.