Abstract
Indian Journal of Modern Research and Reviews, 2026; 4(4): 171-173
Contemporary Penal Policy in the United Kingdom: Crisis Governance, Judicial Doctrine and Human Rights Constraints (2024–2026)
Author Name: Sudip Halder, Dr. Babita Baeraiya
Abstract
<p>The existence of institutional crisis, the legislative intervention, judicial doctrine and the supranational human rights restriction have caused a deep-rooted change in the modern penal policy in the United Kingdom. The introduction of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024, the Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Act 2025 and the Sentencing Act 2026 will be one transformation to a variant of the penal model, which is both selective severity and controlled decarceration. Meanwhile, the jurisprudence of the UK Supreme Court, particularly <strong><em>R v Hayes</em></strong>; <strong><em>R v Palombo</em></strong> and the normative restrictions implied by the European Court of Human Rights [ECtHR] overturns the primacy of proportionality, human dignity and due process. This postulate is based on a synthesis of both empirical criminology and theories of penalty that contemporary penal policy in the UK is a form of the so-called crisis-constitutional penalty, in which punishment is structured according to institutional limitations and through multi-dimensional legalisation, instead of being ordered by a coherent criminal logic.</p>
<p> </p>
Keywords
Contemporary Penal Policy, Crisis Governance, Judicial Doctrine, Human Rights Constraints, Sentencing Reform (UK).
