editor.mrrjournal@gmail.com +91-9650568176 E-ISSN: 2584-184X
Submit Paper

MRR

  • Home
  • About Us
    • INDEXING
    • JOURNAL POLIICY
    • PLAGIARISM POLICY
    • PEER REVIEW POLICY
    • OPEN ACCESS POLICY
    • PUBLICATION ETHICS
    • PRIVACY STATEMENT
  • Editorial Board
  • Publication Info
    • Article Submission
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Publication Ethics
    • Journal Policies
    • Aim and Scope
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
  • Authors Instruction
  • Contact

MRR Journal

Indian Journal of Modern Research and Reviews, 2024; 2(12):25-28

A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis

Authors: Dr. Rakesh Bajaj; Dr. Harish Patond;

1. Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, GMC-Akola, Maharashtra, India

2. Senior Resident, Department of Surgery, GMC-Akola, Maharashtra, India

Paper Type: Research Paper
Article Information
Received: 2024-09-12   |   Accepted: 2024-11-21   |   Published: 2024-12-28
Abstract

Background: The health consequences of gallstones are found to be severe in the present day. As a treatment for gallstones, open cholecystectomy was the gold standard until the end of the 1980s. Surgery has been revolutionized with laparoscopy, leading to a re-evaluation of various treatment modalities, including cholecystectomy, although it also has its drawbacks. This study was conducted to evaluate if laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended over open cholecystectomy as the preferred approach for the treatment of Acute Cholecystitis.

Method: A total of 25 patients were included in this study who were admitted to the surgical wards of a tertiary medical facility in India between November 2020 and October 2022. All the subjects were categorized into two groups, Group I (Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, n=14) and Group II (Open cholecystectomy, n=11).

The main outcomes that were evaluated were pre- and post-operative complications, length of hospital stay, wound infection and return to work. Statistics were used to analyze the collected data.

Results:  The length of the surgery has been significantly longer in Group I (81.0714 13.18) than in Group II (91.363 10.26 minutes) when the two groups had been compared (p = 0.0442 [S]).

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy had more positive results than open cholecystectomy in contexts of postoperative pain (VAS > 4), length of hospital stays, and return to work, and the difference was statistically significant. Wound infection 5 (45.45%) and post-operative paralytic ileus3 (27.27%) were significantly higher in patients who underwent open cholecystectomy. There were no reported significant cases of morbidity or mortality during the study period.

Conclusion: As compared to open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has significant advantages including reduced paralytic ileus, less analgesic use, shorter surgery time, fewer postoperative complications and early discharge and mobilization.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; open surgery; risk factors; Calculous cholecystitis.

How to Cite

. A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Cholecystitis. Indian Journal of Modern Research and Reviews. 2024; 2(12):25-28

Download PDF

Useful Links

  • Home
  • About us
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Submit Paper

Indexing

MRR

Contact Us

Phone: +91-9650568176
Email: editor.mrrjournal@gmail.com | editor.mrrjournal@gmail.com

© Copyright MRR 2023. All Rights Reserved